Re: critical bugs in md raid5
From: Marc (pcg_at_goof.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: /proc parent &proc_root == NULL?"
- In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: critical bugs in md raid5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:48:39 +0100 To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 06:11:34AM +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:
> Marc Lehmann <linux-kernel@plan9.de> writes:
> >
> > The summary seems to be that the linux raid driver only protects your data
> > as long as all disks are fine and the machine never crashes.
>
> "as long as the machine never crashes". That's correct. If you think
Thanks for your thoughts, btw :)
I forgot to mention that even if data is known to be lost it's much better
to return, say, EIO to higher levels than to completely shut down the
device (after all, this is no differnce to what other block devices behave).
Also, it's still likely that some old error can be repaired, as the broken
non-parity block might be old. This is probably better to be handled in
userspace, though, with special tools. But for them it might be vital to
get the correct disk index, to be able to detect the stripe layout.
It's usually much faster to repair and verify, as opposed to format and
restore, of course.
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ pcg@goof.com
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: /proc parent &proc_root == NULL?"
- In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: critical bugs in md raid5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
