Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_stusta.de)
Date: 01/27/05
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] update the email address of Romain Liévin"
- In reply to: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Next in thread: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:20:08 +0100 To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:27:43PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>...
> I greatly appreciate your comments, and they were addressed.
> Part of exported symbols are unexported, patch is just waiting to be sent,
Ah, sorry. I only saw that the patch I sent two months ago still
applies completely (except for an unrelated context change).
> but I do not agree with dscore rename. I just do not understand it's advantage.
It is only a small cosmetic thing:
If there's only one object file in a module, a renaming in the Makefile
is superfluous - you can simply rename the source file
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] update the email address of Romain Liévin"
- In reply to: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Next in thread: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
