Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)
From: Vojtech Pavlik (vojtech_at_suse.cz)
Date: 01/28/05
- Previous message: Michael Gernoth: "Re: AT-Keyboard probing too strict in current bk?"
- In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)"
- Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)"
- Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:10:05 +0100 To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 01:39:08AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Andries Brouwer wrote:
>
> > In short - raw mode in 2.6 is badly broken.
And, btw, raw mode in 2.6 is not badly broken. It works as it is
intended to. If you want the 2.4 behavior on x86, you just need to
specify "atkbd.softraw=0" on the kernel command line.
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Michael Gernoth: "Re: AT-Keyboard probing too strict in current bk?"
- In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)"
- Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)"
- Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|