Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend
From: Pavel Machek (pavel_at_suse.cz)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Resume from initramfs"
- Maybe in reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend"
- Next in thread: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend"
- Reply: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:20:55 +0100 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi!
> > static inline void free_pagedir(struct pbe *pblist)
> > {
> > struct pbe *pbe;
> >
> > while (pblist) {
> > pbe = pblist + PB_PAGE_SKIP;
> > pblist = pbe->next;
> > free_page((unsigned long)pbe);
> > }
> > pr_debug("free_pagedir(): done\n");
> > }
> >
> > Should not you free_page(pblist) instead? This passes address in
> > middle of page to free_page, that seems wrong.
>
> Certainly. It should be something like that:
>
> while (pblist) {
> pbe = pblist;
> pblist = (pbe + PB_PAGE_SKIP)->next;
> free_page((unsigned long)pbe);
> }
Hmm, I see, my "fix" leaks one page of memory during each
suspend... I've fixed it properly now and will eventually propagete it
back.
This should be right..
while (pblist) {
pbe = (pblist + PB_PAGE_SKIP)->next;
free_page((unsigned long)pblist);
pblist = pbe;
}
Pavel
-- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Resume from initramfs"
- Maybe in reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend"
- Next in thread: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend"
- Reply: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|