Re: [PATCH] relayfs redux, part 2

From: Karim Yaghmour (karim_at_opersys.com)
Date: 01/31/05

  • Next message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port" 
    Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:41:20 -0500
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>

    Tom Zanussi wrote:
    > OK, makes sense to me - I'll get rid of relay_reserve and replace it
    > with the simple putc write and variant.

    Please don't do that. Instead, bring back the ad-hoc mode code, that's
    what is was for anyway.

    > You could just create and log into a separate relayfs channel, if you
    > wanted to. Not sure we need to add anything special to support that.

    Postprocessing doesn't solve world famine ;) As far as LTT goes,
    splitting events like this makes it impossible to read large traces.
    Other clients are free to do as they wish.

    Karim 

    -- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
  • Next message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port"

    Relevant Pages