Re: cpufreq problem wrt suspend/resume on Athlon64

From: Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw_at_sisk.pl)
Date: 02/04/05

  • Next message: Herbert Xu: "Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb" 
    To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org
Date:	Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:52:28 +0100

    On Friday, 4 of February 2005 00:34, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > Hi.
    >
    > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 10:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > Instead of trying to blow up the battery I used the patch that forces the CPU
    > > to 800 MHz and it apparently survives resuming on batteries - at least 3
    > > times out of 3 attempts (I'll try some times more tomorrow).
    > >
    > > It seems to boot at 1800 MHz, though, every time, according to
    > > cpufreq_resume().
    >
    > Sounds like some good work. Is 800 the minimum for your laptop?

    Yes, it is.

    > I'm just wondering how you know what speed to choose on other systems.

    Well, I don't know. It seems that for k8-based CPUs the minimum is
    a reasonable choice, but it apparently is not so for other processors.

    Greets,
    Rafael 

    -- 
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
		-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
  • Next message: Herbert Xu: "Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb"

    Relevant Pages
    Loading