Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2
From: Nick Piggin (nickpiggin_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 02/11/05
- Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb"
- In reply to: Paul Davis: "Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2"
- Next in thread: Peter Williams: "Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2"
- Reply: Peter Williams: "Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:04:46 +1100
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:41 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> [ the best solution is .... ]
>
> [ my preferred solution is ... ]
>
> [ it would be better if ... ]
>
> [ this is a kludge and it should be done instead like ... ]
>
> did nobody read what andrew wrote and what JOQ pointed out?
>
> after weeks of debating this, no other conceptual solution emerged
> that did not have at least as many problems as the RT LSM module, and
> all other proposed solutions were also more invasive of other aspects
> of kernel design and operations than RT LSM is.
>
Sure, it is quick and easy. Suits some. At least I do prefer
this to altering the semantics of realtime scheduling.
I can't say much about it because I'm not putting my hand up to
do anything. Just mentioning that rlimit would be better if not
for the userspace side of the equation. I think most were already
agreed on that point anyway though.
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb"
- In reply to: Paul Davis: "Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2"
- Next in thread: Peter Williams: "Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2"
- Reply: Peter Williams: "Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
