Re: Oops with oprofile + RT preempt 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-01
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo_at_elte.hu)
Date: 02/17/05
- Previous message: David Brownell: "Re: SL811 problem on mach-pxa"
- In reply to: Lee Revell: "Re: Oops with oprofile + RT preempt 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-01"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Oops with oprofile + RT preempt 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-01"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:11:45 +0100 To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> I noticed profiling the kernel with PREEMPT_DESKTOP that mcount and
> __mcount add quite a bit of overhead. Something like .5% CPU each.
> Sorry, I didn't save the oprofile output.
>
> So, disable CONFIG_MCOUNT if you want minimal overhead from the RT
> patches. IIRC it was previously stated that the latency tracing
> overhead could be mostly avoided by disabling it at runtime.
yes - most of the overhead can be disabled, but not all. 1% CPU time
might sound alot but when compared against 10% (or more) tracing
overehad it's small. The least overhead comes from disabling tracing in
the .config.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: David Brownell: "Re: SL811 problem on mach-pxa"
- In reply to: Lee Revell: "Re: Oops with oprofile + RT preempt 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-01"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Oops with oprofile + RT preempt 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-01"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|