Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

From: Sean (seanlkml_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 02/18/05

  • Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [2.6 current BK] Unnecesary code gets compiled in during build?" 
    Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:57:51 -0500 (EST)
To: dtor_core@ameritech.net

    On Fri, February 18, 2005 2:49 pm, Dmitry Torokhov said:

    > You from cvs you can import into other SCM of your choise.

    This isn't true unfortunately, a lot of information is lost in cvs. file
    deletes, renames etc.. Plus, the implementation from Bitkeeper is
    lacking, (eg. combining many changes into one).

    >
    > Heh, you don't get to update the master repository even if you are
    > using BK. And you are free to update your local tree with
    > CVS/SVN/whatever. So I am not sure why you trying this argument.

    Yeah, I didn't mean to suggest that it be opened up to the public :o)
    Just that the flow of information wouldn't all have to originate in bk to
    make it into head (ie. bk could pull changes from head too).

    Cheers,
    Sean.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [2.6 current BK] Unnecesary code gets compiled in during build?"

    Relevant Pages