Re: [PATCH] allow vma merging with mlock et. al.
From: Hugh Dickins (hugh_at_veritas.com)
Date: 02/28/05
- Previous message: Bernd Schubert: "x86_64: 32bit emulation problems"
- In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] allow vma merging with mlock et. al."
- Next in thread: Darren Hart: "Re: [PATCH] vm: mlock superfluous variable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:53:41 +0000 (GMT) To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> Successive mlock/munlock calls can leave fragmented vmas because they can
> be split but not merged. Give mlock et. al. full vma merging support.
> While we're at it, move *pprev assignment above first split_vma in
> mprotect_fixup to keep it in step with mlock_fixup (which for mlockall
> ignores errors yet still needs a valid prev pointer).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Bernd Schubert: "x86_64: 32bit emulation problems"
- In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] allow vma merging with mlock et. al."
- Next in thread: Darren Hart: "Re: [PATCH] vm: mlock superfluous variable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]