Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_stusta.de)
Date: 03/01/05
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] SCSI: cleanups"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:32:47 +0100 To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:31:37AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:14:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > You don't need this feature unless you know you need it.
>
> But you may not know that you need it since in the help text I
> intentionally didn't mention which software requires the option to be
> set to Y (I didn't mention it, since I didn't want to use the kernel
> configuration help text to get free advertisement, but OTOH if people is
> unsure while they configure the kernel I certainly prefer that they set
> it to Y ;).
>...
If you want to use Cpushare, you know that you have to enable seccomp.
> Thanks.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] SCSI: cleanups"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
