Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1
From: Chris Wright (chrisw_at_osdl.org)
Date: 03/01/05
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: x86_64: 32bit emulation problems"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:49:16 -0800 To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
* Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org) wrote:
> - I seem to be getting a lot of patches which don't compile if you breathe
> on the .config file, let alone if you try them on another architecture. It
> would be nice to receive less such patches, please.
The ia64 audit bit is likely my fault from the audit header detangle.
I did try w/ and w/out CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL set, but only on one arch.
I also did a grep, but was only looking at audit_putname/getname, and
missed the others. I just did a more complete grep of the symbols that
can get config'd away (including CONFIG_AUDIT as well), and I think
there's a few more missing pieces. Sorry about that. Jeff, Ralf,
Martin, these look ok?
thanks,
-chris
-- A closer sweep of configurable audit symbols shows the following need audit.h included when audit.h is detangled from fs.h as in -mm. arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c for audit_syscall_entry/exit arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c for audit_syscall_entry/exit arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c for audit_syscall_entry/exit Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> ===== arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c 1.21 vs edited ===== --- 1.21/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c 2005-01-20 20:59:15 -08:00 +++ edited/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c 2005-03-01 13:23:06 -08:00 @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include "linux/smp_lock.h" #include "linux/security.h" #include "linux/ptrace.h" +#include "linux/audit.h" #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_MM #include "linux/proc_mm.h" #endif ===== arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c 1.28 vs edited ===== --- 1.28/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c 2005-01-04 18:48:19 -08:00 +++ edited/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c 2005-03-01 13:22:45 -08:00 @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include <linux/ptrace.h> #include <linux/user.h> #include <linux/security.h> +#include <linux/audit.h> #include <asm/segment.h> #include <asm/page.h> ===== arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c 1.15 vs edited ===== --- 1.15/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c 2005-01-30 22:20:14 -08:00 +++ edited/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c 2005-03-01 13:24:48 -08:00 @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <linux/smp_lock.h> #include <linux/user.h> #include <linux/security.h> +#include <linux/audit.h> #include <asm/cpu.h> #include <asm/fpu.h> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: x86_64: 32bit emulation problems"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]