Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering
From: Greg KH (greg_at_kroah.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Previous message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- In reply to: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Next in thread: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Reply: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:23:49 -0800 To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:58:46PM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
> This could be improved: _All_ new features have to go through -mm first
> for a period (of whatever length) / one cycle. 2.6.x only directly picks
> up "obvious" bugfixes, and a select set of features which have ripened
> in -mm. 2.6.x-pre releases would then basically "only" clean up
> integration bugs.
This is the way things work today already. The only exception being the
networking code, but hey, networking's always been special :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- In reply to: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Next in thread: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Reply: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|