Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1
From: Rusty Russell (rusty_at_rustcorp.com.au)
Date: 03/04/05
- Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] new driver for ITM Touch touchscreen"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:23:17 +1100
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 15:00 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Why doesn't an EXPORT_SYMBOL create a reference?
It does: EXPORT_SYMBOL(x) drops the address of "x", including
__attribute_used__, in the __ksymtab section.
However, if CONFIG_MODULES=n, it does nothing: perhaps that is what you
are seeing.
Rusty.
-- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] new driver for ITM Touch touchscreen"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Reply: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|