Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

From: Adam Sampson (azz_at_us-lot.org)
Date: 03/05/05

  • Next message: Raffaele Ianniello: "(no subject)" 
    To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:58:00 +0000

    Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:

    > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
    > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.

    So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
    accepted? 

    -- 
Adam Sampson <azz@us-lot.org>                        <http://offog.org/>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
  • Next message: Raffaele Ianniello: "(no subject)"

    Relevant Pages