Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

From: Greg KH (greg_at_kroah.com)
Date: 03/05/05

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree" 
    Date:	Sat, 5 Mar 2005 09:42:48 -0800
To: Adam Sampson <azz@us-lot.org>

    On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Adam Sampson wrote:
    > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
    >
    > > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
    > > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.
    >
    > So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
    > accepted?

    Good point, I've now added that.

    thanks,

    greg k-h
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree"

    Relevant Pages