Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree
From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap_at_osdl.org)
Date: 03/05/05
- Previous message: L. A. Walsh: "Re: Linux 2.6.11.1"
- In reply to: Adam Sampson: "Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree"
- Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:26:28 -0800 To: Adam Sampson <azz@us-lot.org>
Adam Sampson wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
>
>
>> - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
>> marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.
>
>
> So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
> accepted?
>
That's called a critical patch.
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: L. A. Walsh: "Re: Linux 2.6.11.1"
- In reply to: Adam Sampson: "Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree"
- Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|