Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering
From: Pavel Machek (pavel_at_ucw.cz)
Date: 03/06/05
- Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [2.6 patch] mm/{mmap,nommu}.c: several unexports"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 23:43:17 +0100 To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Hi!
> > The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which
> > is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an
> > official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on
> > linux.bkbits.net)
>
> IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete
> enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it
> also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be.
>
> 2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is
> always cover on a security fix.
Eh?
Like you add security fix and then some formatting change to hide it?
Pavel
-- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [2.6 patch] mm/{mmap,nommu}.c: several unexports"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
