Re: [PATCH] make st seekable again

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjan_at_infradead.org)
Date: 03/10/05

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: make -j4 gets stuck w/ ccache over NFS - solved!"
    To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
    Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:13:53 +0100
    
    

    On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:56 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
    > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    >
    > > > critical user data.
    > > >
    > > > In other words, it should work correctly or not at all. At the least this
    > > > should be a config option, like UNSAFE_TAPE_POSITIONING or some such.
    > > > And show the option if the build includes BROKEN features. That should put
    > > > the decision where it belongs and clarify the possible failures.
    > >
    > > CONFIG_SECURITY_HOLES doesn't make sense.
    > > Better to just fix the security holes instead.
    >
    > I think you're an idealist. If this were something other than tar it would
    > be simple, and you would be right. Well, you ARE right, but a change which
    > breaks tar, which many sites use for backups, is really not practical,
    > without a loophole until tar gets fixed. And as Alan noted, keeping track
    > of the physical position is very hard, and getting a tar fix might take a
    > while.
    >

    No the problem is that the *st* code has a security hole. THAT is the
    problem. Not that it would be seekable. But how it implements the seeks.
    THAT part is the problem. And THAT can be fixed.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: make -j4 gets stuck w/ ccache over NFS - solved!"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: experiences beyond 4 GB RAM with 2.4.22
      ... > 1) nfs clients see timeouts again, ... > fix it through more nfs-daemons and ... > 2) Box is very slow, kswapd looks very active during tar of a local harddisk. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29
      ... > suggest a long term fix to the tar people (a fix that should be compatible ... > with all Unix tape semantics I know) and also suggest possible fixes to st ... please let's get a tar fix in the pipeline. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
      ... semantics for the sake of backup? ... tar is easy, we'll fix it and send in ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] make st seekable again
      ... On Iau, 2005-03-10 at 12:10, Arjan van de Ven wrote: ... > Better to just fix the security holes instead. ... Still should be a "ask your vendor to fix tar" item. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [RFC] must fix lists
      ... Someone also needs to go fix all the 2.4 security holes still in 2.6 ... last time I checked - things like the execve holes and execve versus ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)