Re: 2.6.Stable and EXTRAVERSION

From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen_at_tmr.com)
Date: 03/11/05

  • Next message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: A new 10GB Ethernet Driver by Chelsio Communications"
    Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:55:52 -0500
    To: "Justin M. Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
    
    

    Justin M. Forbes wrote:
    > With the new stable series kernels, the .x versioning is being added to
    > EXTRAVERSION. This has traditionally been a space for local modification.
    > I know several distributions are using EXTRAVERSION for build numbers,
    > platform and assorted other information to differentiate their kernel
    > releases.
    > I would propose that the new stable series kernels move the .x version
    > information somewhere more official. I certainly do not mind throwing
    > together a patch to support DOTVERSION or what ever people want to call it.
    > Is anyone opposed to such a change?

    I think it will confuse scripts which expect something local in the 4th
    field. I confess that I have such, and that field is turned into a
    directory name during builds, so test results are saved in a proper
    place. I think vendors and people who care will just keep three digits,
    and those who want the last can make their EXTRAVERSION
        2.Joes_Bar_&_Grill_486
    or whatever is needed.

    Add to that the confusion of having mainline releases
       2.6.x.LOCAL
    and stable be
       2.6.x.y.LOCAL
    and you really make work for people who do things with scripts. This is
    probably not an issue for humans, and people could program around it,
    but I think it's a solution to a non-problem. Vendors will have the
    -stable and their own patches, so they probably will only keep three
    fields anyway.

    And don't even suggest tell Linus to start calling mainline releases
    2.6.x.0 because that would probably break even more things.

    Leave well enough alone!

    -- 
        -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
    "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
      last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: A new 10GB Ethernet Driver by Chelsio Communications"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 2.6.Stable and EXTRAVERSION
      ... > With the new stable series kernels, the .x versioning is being added to ... > I know several distributions are using EXTRAVERSION for build numbers, ... SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX GMBH ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.Stable and EXTRAVERSION
      ... > With the new stable series kernels, the .x versioning is being added to ... > I know several distributions are using EXTRAVERSION for build numbers, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.Stable and EXTRAVERSION
      ... >> With the new stable series kernels, the .x versioning is being added to ... >> I know several distributions are using EXTRAVERSION for build numbers, ... since it means one less kernel patch to port. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.Stable and EXTRAVERSION
      ... > With the new stable series kernels, the .x versioning is being added to ... > I know several distributions are using EXTRAVERSION for build numbers, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: How to retrieve version from kernel source (the right way)?
      ... > Then we started to grep VERSION, PATCHLEVEL, SUBLEVEL and EXTRAVERSION ... > from the kernel's Makefile. ... since some distributors seem to ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)