Re: [PATCH] embarassing typo
From: Gene Heskett (gene.heskett_at_verizon.net)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: John Richard Moser: "LSM hooks"
- In reply to: John Pearson: "Re: [PATCH] embarassing typo"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [PATCH] embarassing typo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:16:38 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 18:38, John Pearson wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:53:28AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote
>
>> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 20:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 16:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> >> Well, it's a matter of readability mostly. ?For now at least,
>> >> when char is always 8 bytes...
>> >
>> >Wow, that's one huge char you have there ;)
>>
>> Yeah, I was gonna ask what language is so complex as to need an 8
>> byte char?
>>
>> Certainly not an earthly one I'd think ;)
>
>Might come in handy for Perl 7 Regular Expression syntax...
Humm, yes, perl. I'd forgotten that. Would an 8 byte char be enough
in that case?
>John.
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: John Richard Moser: "LSM hooks"
- In reply to: John Pearson: "Re: [PATCH] embarassing typo"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [PATCH] embarassing typo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
