Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 02/13] scsi: don't turn on REQ_SPECIAL on sgtable allocation failure.
From: James Bottomley (James.Bottomley_at_SteelEye.com)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: James Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 01/13] scsi: don't use blk_insert_request() for requeueing"
- In reply to: Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 02/13] scsi: don't turn on REQ_SPECIAL on sgtable allocation failure."
- Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 04/13] scsi: remove meaningless volatile qualifiers from structure definitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:53:45 -0600
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 18:08 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Don't turn on REQ_SPECIAL on sgtable allocation failure. This
> was the last place where REQ_SPECIAL is turned on for normal
> requests.
If you do this, you'll leak a command every time the sgtable allocation
fails.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: James Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 01/13] scsi: don't use blk_insert_request() for requeueing"
- In reply to: Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 02/13] scsi: don't turn on REQ_SPECIAL on sgtable allocation failure."
- Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 04/13] scsi: remove meaningless volatile qualifiers from structure definitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|