Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07
From: Steven Rostedt (rostedt_at_goodmis.org)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm3"
- In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:22:36 -0500
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 19:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> > Oh, and did your really want to assign debug = .1?
>
> > - .debug = .1, .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__
> > + .debug = 1, .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__
>
> doh - indeed. This means rwlocks were nondebug all along? Ouch. I've
> uploaded -42-08 with the fix.
I noticed it because starting with V0.7.41-25 (although I only actually
noticed it with 42-07) not only were they nondebug, but they also didn't
have any priority inheritance.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm3"
- In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]