Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_at_joe-job.com)
Date: 04/11/05
- Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- In reply to: Mingming Cao: "Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies"
- Next in thread: Lee Revell: "Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies"
- Reply: Lee Revell: "Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: cmm@us.ibm.com Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:12:50 -0400
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 11:38 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> I will work on a patch for Lee to try sometime tonight.
>
Just FYI, this will take a while to test, because this latency seems
quite rare. I haven't seen it again since my original report.
Hopefully I can reproduce it with enough dbench processes.
This seems to agree with your earlier observation that we seem to have
been quite unlucky.
Anyway, if I understand the thread it seems like this could increase
performance as well as help latency.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- In reply to: Mingming Cao: "Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies"
- Next in thread: Lee Revell: "Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies"
- Reply: Lee Revell: "Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|