Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
From: Daniel Jacobowitz (dan_at_debian.org)
Date: 04/12/05
- Previous message: Kumar Gala: "[PATCH] ppc32: refactor FPU exception handling"
- In reply to: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- Next in thread: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- Reply: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:13:24 -0400 To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:56:29PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Well the sanity check on the "server" side is always enforced. You
> can't "trick" sftp or ftp to not check permissions. So checking on
> the "client" side too (where the fuse daemon is running) makes no
> sense, does it?
That argument doesn't make much sense to me. But we're at the end of
my useful contributions to this discussion; I'm going to be quiet now
and hope some folks who know more about filesystems have more useful
responses.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Kumar Gala: "[PATCH] ppc32: refactor FPU exception handling"
- In reply to: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- Next in thread: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- Reply: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
