Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation
From: Timur Tabi (timur.tabi_at_ammasso.com)
Date: 04/18/05
- Previous message: Richard Henderson: "Re: Linux Alpha port: LVM"
- In reply to: Roland Dreier: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Reply: Roland Dreier: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:09:35 -0500 To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Roland Dreier wrote:
> Troy> How is memory pinning handled? (I haven't had time to read
> Troy> all the code, so please excuse my ignorance of something
> Troy> obvious).
>
> The userspace library calls mlock() and then the kernel does
> get_user_pages().
Why do you call mlock() and get_user_pages()? In our code, we only call mlock(), and the
memory is pinned. We have a test case that fails if only get_user_pages() is called, but
it passes if only mlock() is called.
-- Timur Tabi Staff Software Engineer timur.tabi@ammasso.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Richard Henderson: "Re: Linux Alpha port: LVM"
- In reply to: Roland Dreier: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Reply: Roland Dreier: "Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|