Re: RT patch acceptance
From: Nick Piggin (nickpiggin_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 05/30/05
- Previous message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3: ALSA broken ?"
- In reply to: Esben Nielsen: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Reply: Steven Rostedt: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Reply: Esben Nielsen: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 21:58:59 +1000 To: Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Esben Nielsen wrote:
> I do like the idea of guest kernels - especially the ability to enforce a
> strict seperation of RT and non-RT. But you can't use _any_ part of the
> Linux kernel in your RT application - not even drivers. I know a lot of
If you can't use the drivers, then presumably they're no good
to be used as they are for realtime in Linux either, though :(
In which case, you may still be better off porting the driver
over and rewriting it to be hard-realtime than rewriting Linux
itself ;)
But I could be wrong. I don't pretend to have the answers (just
questions!).
Thanks,
Nick
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3: ALSA broken ?"
- In reply to: Esben Nielsen: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Reply: Steven Rostedt: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Reply: Esben Nielsen: "Re: RT patch acceptance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|