Re: [Clusters_sig] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Cluster Summit 2005
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree (lmb_at_suse.de)
Date: 05/31/05
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code"
- Next in thread: David Nicol: "Common Cluster Infrastructure discussion"
- Reply: David Nicol: "Common Cluster Infrastructure discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:26:24 +0200 To: Robert Wipfel <rawipfel@novell.com>, davidnicol@gmail.com, phillips@redhat.com
On 2005-05-21T09:29:01, Robert Wipfel <rawipfel@novell.com> wrote:
> outside looking in, is web services an! d grid. Returning to the
> reality of many vendor's enterprise* business, the suitespot for h/a
> clusters still seems to be somewhere around ~8 dual-CPU nodes with
> many customers deploying multiple similar clusters. Nodes are never in
> multiple clusters at once, rather, individual nodes are members of a
> cluster and that cluster might be a member of a cluster of clusters.
A single node must be big enough to support sane load balancing; ie, big
enough to run at least one (or more) "whole" resource entities / jobs.
That is the breaking point after which it is more sensible to deploy
more nodes - with looser coupling - than making a single node / SSI
component larger, because decoupled operation means less complexity for
fault isolation.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
-- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code"
- Next in thread: David Nicol: "Common Cluster Infrastructure discussion"
- Reply: David Nicol: "Common Cluster Infrastructure discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|