Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane_at_arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: 06/02/05

  • Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Linux does not care for data integrity" 
    Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:54:34 -0600 (MDT)
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

    Hi Tony,

    On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Tony Lindgren wrote:

    > Here's an updated version of the dynamic tick patch.
    >
    > It's mostly clean-up and it's now using the standard
    > monotonic_clock() functions as suggested by John Stultz.
    >
    > Please let me know of any issues with the patch. I'll continue to do
    > more clean-up on it, but I think the basic functionality is done.
    >
    > Thomas, where do you have the latest version of your ACPI idle
    > patch? I'd like to add that to the dyn-tick page as well.
    >
    > Older patches and some related links are at:
    >
    > http://muru.com/linux/dyntick/

    Are there any 'known issues' wrt various timer sources with this version?

    Thanks,
            Zwane

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Linux does not care for data integrity"

    Relevant Pages