Re: [RFC] Patch series to remove devfs [00/22]

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_stusta.de)
Date: 06/11/05

  • Next message: Robert Han***: "Re: amd64 cdrom access locks system" 
    Date:	Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:59:04 +0200
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

    On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > Yes, there are many places where 2.4 and 2.6 are not source compatible
    > > for good reasons. But if the effort for maintaining compatibility
    > > between 2.4 and 2.6 in one area is as easy as keeping a header file with
    > > some dummy funtions it's worth considering.
    >
    > The devfs calls for 2.4 and 2.6 are totally incompatible.
    >...

    OK, it seems I've missed how much devfs changed during 2.5 times...

    Simply discard my emails in this thread.

    cu
    Adrian 

    -- 
       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
  • Next message: Robert Han***: "Re: amd64 cdrom access locks system"