Re: [PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug
From: Mikael Pettersson (mikpe_at_csd.uu.se)
Date: 06/12/05
- Previous message: Abhijit Bhopatkar: "Re: stupid SATA questions"
- Maybe in reply to: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug"
- Next in thread: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:11:49 +0200 (MEST) To: ak@suse.de
Andi wrote:
> > @@ -113,9 +113,18 @@ quiet_ni_syscall:
> > PTREGSCALL stub32_fork, sys32_fork
> > PTREGSCALL stub32_clone, sys32_clone
> > PTREGSCALL stub32_vfork, sys32_vfork
> > - PTREGSCALL stub32_iopl, sys_iopl
> > PTREGSCALL stub32_rt_sigsuspend, sys_rt_sigsuspend
> >
> > + .macro PTREGSCALL3 label, func, arg
>
> PTREGSCALL3? I'm sure that is not in 2.6. How about just changing
> PTREGSCALL globally?
Well I renamed it so that I could use it _only_ for the required
syscalls, i.e. sys_iopl(). I can change all of them if you feel
that's more appropriate.
/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Abhijit Bhopatkar: "Re: stupid SATA questions"
- Maybe in reply to: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug"
- Next in thread: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|