Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 06/13/05
- Previous message: Neil Horman: "Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Next in thread: Ondrej Zary: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Ondrej Zary: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Ondrej Zary: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:09:04 +0100
On Llu, 2005-06-13 at 15:06, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Make sure you have pre-empt disabled and the antcipatory I/O scheduler
> > disabled.
> >
> I don't think that those could explain it.
Try it and see. The anticipatory I/O scheduler does horrible things to
my IDE streaming performance numbers and to swap performance. It tries
to merge I/O by delaying it which is deeply ungood when it comes to IDE
streaming even if its good for general I/O.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Neil Horman: "Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Next in thread: Ondrej Zary: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Ondrej Zary: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Reply: Ondrej Zary: "Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|