Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
From: Ulrich Drepper (drepper_at_redhat.com)
Date: 06/13/05
- Previous message: Vladimir Saveliev: "Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11.10 reiserfs panic with quota and soft raid1"
- In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls."
- Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls."
- Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:10:13 -0700 To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
David Woodhouse wrote:
> 64-bit value for which? For seconds?
poll()'s timeout value is measrued in milliseconds. Using a 32bit
value, as implied by using 'int' for the type, limits the mximum timeout
to be 2^31-1 milliseconds, which means about 24 days. Believe it or
not, people are complaining about this. Changing the timeout to a 64
bit millisecond timeout would lift the limitation from the API's POV. I
don't know what limitations exist in the kernel itself.
-- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature
- Previous message: Vladimir Saveliev: "Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11.10 reiserfs panic with quota and soft raid1"
- In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls."
- Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls."
- Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|