Re: [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3)
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_at_joe-job.com)
Date: 06/21/05
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [ltp] Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?"
- In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3)"
- Next in thread: john stultz: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:40:46 -0400
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 00:05 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> With -mm you can now choose the HZ value, so that's not really the
> problem anymore. A lot of archs even never changed to a higher HZ
> value.
That does not solve anything, going back to HZ=100 is a big user-visible
regression because the resolution of sleep() (and poll, etc) is now 10ms
rather than 1ms. Many apps have RT constraints between 1ms and 10ms.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [ltp] Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?"
- In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3)"
- Next in thread: john stultz: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|