Re: [PATCH] Checkpoint lists split
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 06/27/05
- Previous message: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: ACPI-based PCI resources: PCMCIA bugfix, but resources missing in trees"
- In reply to: Jan Kara: "[PATCH] Checkpoint lists split"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:26:47 -0700 To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> I've noticed that the patch splitting transaction's t_checkpoint_list
> into two lists (one for buffers to-be-submitted and one for already
> submitted buffers) is not in -mm kernels. Is there any reason why you've
> dropped it? If you just missed the version that fixed the bug or some
> similar mistake happened then please put the patch into -mm (it's
> attached and applies fine against 2.6.12-mm2).
It's still sitting in my to-apply folder, so it isn't lost. The first
version was a bit traumatic, so I was holding off until I have time to do a
bunch of filesystem testing..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: ACPI-based PCI resources: PCMCIA bugfix, but resources missing in trees"
- In reply to: Jan Kara: "[PATCH] Checkpoint lists split"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
