Re: [00/07] -stable review
From: Jim MacBaine (jmacbaine_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/28/05
- Previous message: Ondrej Zary: "Booting uncompressed kernel image on i386?"
- In reply to: Chris Wright: "[00/07] -stable review"
- Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [stable] Re: [00/07] -stable review"
- Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [stable] Re: [00/07] -stable review"
- Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [00/07] -stable review"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:10:18 +0200 To: stable@kernel.org
On 6/28/05, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> wrote:
> Responses should be made by Wed, Jun 29, 23:00 UTC. Anything received after
> that time, might be too late.
Will the fix for the iptables physdev match go into -stable?
I'd regard the aesthetic objections as secondary in a stable kernel
series. If physdev match stays in the kernel, the fix should IMHO go
into -stable.
Regards,
Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ondrej Zary: "Booting uncompressed kernel image on i386?"
- In reply to: Chris Wright: "[00/07] -stable review"
- Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [stable] Re: [00/07] -stable review"
- Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [stable] Re: [00/07] -stable review"
- Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [00/07] -stable review"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|