Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
From: Arjan van de Ven (arjan_at_infradead.org)
Date: 06/28/05
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: Memory Management during Program Loading"
- In reply to: Christoph Lameter: "[PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386"
- Next in thread: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386"
- Reply: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:56:15 +0200
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:47 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Place x86_64 and i386 syscall table into the read only section.
>
> Remove the syscall tables from the data section and place them into the
> readonly section (like IA64).
I like it.. however I think the 32 bit compat syscall table on x86-64
deserves the same treatment....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: Memory Management during Program Loading"
- In reply to: Christoph Lameter: "[PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386"
- Next in thread: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386"
- Reply: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|