Re: struct class question
From: Luben Tuikov (luben_tuikov_at_adaptec.com)
Date: 06/30/05
- Previous message: Hjkr.Womack_at_comcast.net: "Application approval #914884R Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:07:30 -0800"
- In reply to: James Bottomley: "Re: struct class question"
- Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: struct class question"
- Reply: James Bottomley: "Re: struct class question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:03:49 -0400 To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
On 06/29/05 18:01, James Bottomley wrote:
>>Thus we get the pretty flat sysfs class hierarchy:
>>/sys/class/<if>/<device>
>
> That's by design. The class contains a list of all the devices
> implementing the interface.
Ok, makes sense.
> Interface (class) is tied to struct device. If it doesn't have a struct
> device, then it can't have a class and isn't a proper sysfs leaf. If
Makes sense.
> the device doesn't exist or it can't be directly controlled, then we
> probably don't need a class for it, right? As to whether it needs to
Yes, we don't need a struct device and/or struct class_device for it.
> exist at all if we can't do anything with it, I suppose that depends on
> whether it's necessary to the tree representation or not (a bit like
> channels in SCSI. They have meaning, but no sysfs representation on
> their own).
Very good analogy. In this respect I think we should represent
phys, ports, and expanders just as the discover process sees them,
in the same way, as you pointed out, channels are represented
even though the do not quite exist (but are an abstraction).
>>/sys/class/sas/
>>/sys/class/sas/ha0/
>>/sys/class/sas/ha1/
>>/sys/class/sas/ha1/phys/
>>/sys/class/sas/ha1/ports/
>>etc.
>
>
> No, this is where you go wrong. The sysfs tree exists under the host<n>
> for scsi (and is parented to the PCI/etc device), so you can have
> something like
>
> .../host1/
> .../host1/phys/
> .../host1/ports/
Is this
/sys/class/scsi_host/host1
Or is it (e.g.),
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/host1
?
> (and obviously you need to know where you're putting the targets under
> this).
True.
> So the rich deep tree is under devices and the class tree represents a
> flat look into that for devices implementing the specific interface.
In which case the flat class/ wouldn't represent phys, ports and expanders
as they do not have struct device/struct class_device; and not directly
controlled by the kernel; just as "channel".
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Hjkr.Womack_at_comcast.net: "Application approval #914884R Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:07:30 -0800"
- In reply to: James Bottomley: "Re: struct class question"
- Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: struct class question"
- Reply: James Bottomley: "Re: struct class question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
