Re: FUSE merging?
From: Avuton Olrich (avuton_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/30/05
- Previous message: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "[patch 0/12] lsm stacking v0.2: intro"
- In reply to: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: FUSE merging?"
- Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: FUSE merging?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:39:37 -0700 To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
On 6/30/05, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> > Then can you please accept that FUSE will not get merged right now.
> My argument is: IF it's not going to get merged now, can we please
> continue the discussion about why it's unacceptable, and what are the
> alternatives.
Why has there not been more discussion about just making an option for
those 15 lines, just for merging's sake, and hopefully after more
discussion, the option will go away one way or another. On the other
hand everyone says security, security, security and I don't remember
one person actually saying something negative about what it does to
security.
avuton
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "[patch 0/12] lsm stacking v0.2: intro"
- In reply to: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: FUSE merging?"
- Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: FUSE merging?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
