Re: reiser4 plugins
From: Eric Van Hensbergen (ericvh_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/30/05
- Previous message: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "[patch 8/12] lsm stacking v0.2: selinux: use security_*_value API"
- In reply to: Markus QT=F6rnqvist?=: "Re: reiser4 plugins"
- Next in thread: Hubert Chan: "Re: reiser4 plugins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:57:19 -0500 To: Markus Törnqvist <mjt@nysv.org>
On 6/30/05, Markus Törnqvist <mjt@nysv.org> wrote:
>
> >instead of trying to get a monstrosity (albeit a very cool one,
> >conceptually) into the kernel. Sure, it could be made to work,
> >but not without dropping our Unixness. And if we do, we should
> >start by looking at Plan 9 =)
>
> What's wrong with "dropping our Unixness" if it means taking
> an extra step toward Plan 9?
>
> Why is this a bad idea?
>
It's not. For those who don't already know about it: check out the
v9fs project (http://v9fs.sf.net) - we're taking steps of moving the
Linux kernel towards Plan 9 while trying to preserve Unix semantics
where they make sense.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "[patch 8/12] lsm stacking v0.2: selinux: use security_*_value API"
- In reply to: Markus QT=F6rnqvist?=: "Re: reiser4 plugins"
- Next in thread: Hubert Chan: "Re: reiser4 plugins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
