Re: xor as a lazy comparison

From: Philippe Troin (phil_at_fifi.org)
Date: 07/25/05

  • Next message: Lee Revell: "Re: xor as a lazy comparison" 
    To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Date:	25 Jul 2005 12:16:56 -0700

    Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> writes:

    > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 13:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > > Doesn't matter. The cycles saved for old compilers is not rational to
    > > have obfuscated code.
    >
    > Where do we draw the line with this? Is x *= 2 preferable to x <<= 2 as
    > well?

    Depends if you want to multiply by 2 or 4 :-)

    Phil.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Lee Revell: "Re: xor as a lazy comparison"

    Relevant Pages