Re: xor as a lazy comparison
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_at_joe-job.com)
Date: 07/25/05
- Previous message: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: Netlink connector"
- In reply to: Philippe Troin: "Re: xor as a lazy comparison"
- Next in thread: Paulo Marques: "Re: xor as a lazy comparison"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:27:26 -0400
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 12:16 -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 13:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Doesn't matter. The cycles saved for old compilers is not rational to
> > > have obfuscated code.
> >
> > Where do we draw the line with this? Is x *= 2 preferable to x <<= 2 as
> > well?
>
> Depends if you want to multiply by 2 or 4 :-)
Ah, this explains why my drivers never worked...
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: Netlink connector"
- In reply to: Philippe Troin: "Re: xor as a lazy comparison"
- Next in thread: Paulo Marques: "Re: xor as a lazy comparison"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
