Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch
From: Keith Owens (kaos_at_sgi.com)
Date: 07/29/05
- Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- In reply to: George Anzinger: "[PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch"
- Next in thread: George Anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch"
- Reply: George Anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: george@mvista.com Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:50:22 +1000
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:31:58 -0700,
George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>I have been doing some work on kgdb to pull a few of it "fingers" out of
>various places in the kernel. This is the final location where we have
>a kgdb intercept not covered by a notify.
I like the idea, but the hook should be in die_nmi(), not in the
watchdog, using the reason that is already passed into die_nmi.
die_nmi() is also called for a real NMI.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- In reply to: George Anzinger: "[PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch"
- Next in thread: George Anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch"
- Reply: George Anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
