Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo_at_elte.hu)
Date: 07/29/05
- Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:53:40 +0200 To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Well, you can easily see suboptimal scheduling decisions on many
> programs with lots of interprocess communication. For example, tbench
> on a dual Xeon:
>
> processes 1 2 3 4
>
> 2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500
> no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500
>
> Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.
what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|