Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_at_joe-job.com)
Date: 07/30/05
- Previous message: jt: "2.6.12 Stalls this is CC copy I forgot when mailing Andrew"
- In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:08:47 -0400
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 21:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I think this is a good argument for leaving HZ at 1000 until some of
> > these userspace bugs are fixed.
>
> WTF? HZ=1000 eats energy like crazy. artsd eats energy like crazy. And
> you advocate breaking kernel because artsd is broken?!
Also as Con's numbers demonstrate, from the interactivity POV it is you
who are breaking the kernel.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: jt: "2.6.12 Stalls this is CC copy I forgot when mailing Andrew"
- In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]