Re: inter_module_get and __symbol_get

From: D. ShadowWolf (dhazelton_at_enter.net)
Date: 07/31/05

  • Next message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [sched, patch] better wake-balancing, #2"
    To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Date:	Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:27:18 -0400
    
    

    On this topic I have to weigh in that I just subscribed to the kernel list
    because I have had to undo a modification made to the kernel around version
    2.6.10 that stopped the export of 'inter_module_get'. To me it appears that
    some kernel developers forget that there are those of us out there who do not
    have broadband connections and are shafted with low-end hardware. In this
    case I am currently stuck using a Lucent Winmodem to connect to the internet.
    The need to undo that patch arose when I upgraded to 2.6.12.3 and found that
    the drivers provided by the linmodem project were dependant on that function.
    If the new system has been targeted at only GPL symbols, then I am certain it
    is definately not something good for the kernel.

    I enjoy GPL'd software as much as the next guy, but forgetting that there are
    people in the world dependant on third-party drivers that may or may not have
    a non-GPL license attached to them shows short-sightedness on the part of the
    people involved.

    I have my own issues with the modem I'm currently using, and with the fact
    that Lucent sits behind a wall of NDA's and other legal documents and refuses
    to release the entire source of the driver, instead making us rely on a
    driver that has a precompiled binary as part of it's source. I'm certain
    there are people that could reverse engineer the binary (I could do it
    myself), but with the current state of the law in the US and abroad doing so
    could cause major legal troubles.

    Well... enough rambling. I've used too much bandwidth as it is.

    DRH
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [sched, patch] better wake-balancing, #2"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ACPI Error under 2.6.26-rc*
      ... and attach the rsdp for all of the three cases (good, ACPI Error, ... could you please attach the dmesg output of a 2.6.25.10 kernel which has ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # Device Drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • 2.6.25 Regression: DriveStatusError
      ... I tried all -git Kernels since begining of cycle and starting when they finaly ... Root is on a raid1 using a IDE Samsung SP1614N as hda and a SATA Samsung ... Kernel driver in use: VIA_IDE ... # AX.25 network device drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.25-rc0 (#2)
      ... ACPI: add newline to printk ... SMP ... Kernel panic - not syncing: ... # Infrared-port device drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Why is /sys/class/power_supply/CMB1/energy_now not exported?
      ... [fixing bad linux kernel mailing list email address - sorry, ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # Core Netfilter Configuration ... # AX.25 network device drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: ACPI Error under 2.6.26-rc*
      ... Linux 2.6.25.10 always works. ... Now I see the ACPI Error under the 2.6.25.10 kernel sometimes too, ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # Device Drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)