Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree (lmb_at_suse.de)
Date: 08/02/05
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- In reply to: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Next in thread: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Reply: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Reply: Joel Jaeggli: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Reply: Oliver Neukum: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:20:49 +0200 To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
On 2005-08-02T10:02:59, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> > Maybe new desktop systems - but what about the tens of millions of old
> > systems that don't.
> Does anyone really give a shit about saving power on the desktop anyway?
> This is basically a laptop issue.
Desktops? Screw desktops. (Unless of course you're one of those
environmental friendly guys, but then you probably are simply too cheap
to buy a SUV too!)
But rather think "data center".
Those guys want maximum cycles per watt. One way of getting there is
using less watts when we don't use all cycles. This bring down power
consumption, which directly brings down heat production, which brings
down A/C needs.
Everyone wants to save power.
-- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- In reply to: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Next in thread: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Reply: Lee Revell: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Reply: Joel Jaeggli: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Reply: Oliver Neukum: "Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|