Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
From: André Tomt (andre_at_tomt.net)
Date: 08/03/05
- Previous message: Jan De Luyck: "Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression?"
- In reply to: Martin Wilck: "Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED"
- Next in thread: Adam Goode: "Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:08:40 +0200 To: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Martin Wilck wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>>> If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
>>> wrong in setting the SActive bit.
>>
>>
>> I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
>> original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
>
>
> Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the
> activity LED?
I have, Asus P5LD2 i945P, ICH7R AHCI controller, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250
250GB "SATA2" drives. Kernel 2.6.12.x
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jan De Luyck: "Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression?"
- In reply to: Martin Wilck: "Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED"
- Next in thread: Adam Goode: "Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|