Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
From: James Morris (jmorris_at_redhat.com)
Date: 08/05/05
- Previous message: John Bäckstrand: "assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out) failed"
- In reply to: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "[PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Next in thread: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Reply: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Reply: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:55:28 -0400 (EDT) To: serue@us.ibm.com
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 serue@us.ibm.com wrote:
> The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset.
> Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc. dbench and tbench were
> run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each; results are mean +/-
> 95% confidence half-interval. The 'static slot' kernel had a single
> static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct
> hlist_head security.
Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps
as secondary module) ?
- James
-- James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: John Bäckstrand: "assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out) failed"
- In reply to: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "[PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Next in thread: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Reply: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Reply: serue_at_us.ibm.com: "Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|