Re: tcpdump confused with NAT-T+IPSec Packets
From: Herbert Xu (herbert_at_gondor.apana.org.au)
Date: 08/22/05
- Previous message: Douglas McNaught: "Re: Binding a thread (or specific process) to a designated CPU"
- In reply to: Gopalakrishnan Raman: "tcpdump confused with NAT-T+IPSec Packets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: gopal@rgopal.com (Gopalakrishnan Raman) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:22:35 +1000
Gopalakrishnan Raman <gopal@rgopal.com> wrote:
> The problem is that packet_rcv() calls skb_clone() which is the
> right thing to do in all cases except when the data portion of the
> incoming skb is being modified in place. I replaced it with a pskb_copy()
> in the case when the packet is likely to be NAT-T or ESP. The patch
> for this follows the end of this mail and seems to work quite well.
This bug has already been fixed in 2.6.12.
-- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Douglas McNaught: "Re: Binding a thread (or specific process) to a designated CPU"
- In reply to: Gopalakrishnan Raman: "tcpdump confused with NAT-T+IPSec Packets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]